It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? If this was used to shoot video you would think that the first image was using a green screen. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. Available 03/21/23. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. 1. I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO However, when my Canon "L" lenses are used at f8 they are all very sharp and the 135L does not blow the others away. On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. the lens is built strong, very strong. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. Read on to find out which you should be using and why! It could easily rival 'bokeh monsters lenses' at fraction of their price. Aside from being much more affordable, telephoto lenses are easier to transport, easier to mount and easier to guide, and are much more likely to produce encouraging results to a beginner. Some lenses are incurable. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. wew.. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. This way the focus will favor the red light which is more objectionable within a star image than a bit of blue. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. The author's recipe for a good photo is:1) Just shoot blindly, with no regard to what's in the frame, because the lens will blur away everything on the background.2) If (1) does not work, just head on to https://www.bhphotovideo.com, download a jpg of the lens you were using, and photoshop it on top of the taillaits of the passig car that didn't get blurred out enough.3?) At under 900USD, it's a steal. Without the blurb I would have taken it as a 24 hour news studio shot with back projection or a cut and paste layer.The other stuff is really nice though. I've seen several listed but here are more to consider. How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. A lot of lenses today are better than anything money could buy in 1980. I got mine for $60.00 on Craigslist but seen them on eBay for $100 and less all the time. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 BTW, the 300-mm Tele-Tessar you describe -- what camera was it made for? In fact, it might be fun to try! Creamy smooth bokeh. Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. The Bokeh includes as well all that is in the focus, but mainly talked about how it comes visible in out of focus areas. But you just know that there is the professionalism that is lacking here -- and the writer's Instagram page confirms that. If You can not, buy Canon EF 85/1.8, which delivers quite similar results. Definitely now on my to-buy list. Must have if you're serious about portraits. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. I have only owned my 135mm for less then a year, but already it is one of my top three most used and most fun lenses. This brings me to my question. Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. Also, as creative as the wide-field 135mm focal length is, its not practical for smaller DSOs and most galaxies. A promising start, no doubt, but not a master yet! I have had a blast with a samyang, but a used 135mm f2.8 is VERY . Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. Perfect lens on the same level as CZ! What I am trying to avoid is spending another $1,100 on a quality APO, and instead using my existing Nikkor 180mm ED lens with a Baader-modified Canon 450D that I just obtained. You may need to stop down to control star bloat, and thats exactly what Ive done with this 135. So I feel I'm being cheated. So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. Hey Trevor, great article! Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. http://www.idyll.com/135. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej best lens, blur, sharp-super, no CA, minimal shading. Thanks & Cheers For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. Beware others critical comments here about how flat these images look, the author has chosen specific topics and viewpoints to highlight f2 with this lens, so see the wow review for what it is please and the negative comments need placing in context. It's a trade off. Reducing aperture with the built-in aperture iris interferes with the light path, and results in eight diffraction spikes around bright star images. And because you can shoot between F/2 and F/4, plenty of light reaches the sensor in a relatively short exposure. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. What's it got and what's it like to use? Comment * document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a0721c0ca7d0974fd27b5d0ceb81918a" );document.getElementById("cfd2c22fe2").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Your email address will not be published. They seem to be really good for NB work. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. Or is there a use case for fitting the Samyang 135mm to a Panasonic gx85 (or Panasonic gh5) ?? If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. As you know, camera lenses come in varying focal lengths, apertures, and optical quality. The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. Of the old teles I've had, Nikon's 400mm f/3.5 was decent, Olympus's 300mm f/4.5 was good (it had a precursor to ED glass) Pentax's 300mm Takumar was TERRIBLE, Pentax's 500mm was terrible, Nikon's 135 f/2.8 Q was ok, and Sigma's 400mm f/5.6 "apo" was satisfactory. This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). My Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 mounted to a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. I wanted to add my experience with some lenses that I thought worthy of being considered too, and some of the equipment that I have used. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. FULL FRAME TELEPHOTO 135mm F2.0 No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. Don't know what the young man uses as his camera, and if he has tried to keep the noise under control, or even tried to focus on the eyes of the mallard, or the cat (their eyes are not truly in focus). It is worth of it's price?Any links to astrophotos with this lens?Thanks. SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). Its nice to have the F/2. This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. Litepanels Studio X2 Bi-Color LED Fresnel Light. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said.
Effectiveness Of The North Cronulla Sea Wall, Arrests Made In Lenawee County, Michigan, Articles C